Being Maltese
Professor Henry Frendo discusses the urgent question of what it means to be Maltese:
First, Malta is a relatively new state. It has only been independent for 44 years. Italy and Germany, compared to Britain and France, have often been referred to as "new" states because they were only unified in 1870. Indeed, we have even had two correspondents in this newspaper alleging that the Maltese nation did not exist, wondering what there was to "preserve" in it at all ("what, in a jar?", a female columnist for this newspaper once wrote derisively from an English University).
More serious has been the allegation by a Maltese sociologist, now living in Canada, to the effect that Malta exists only as a state, not as a nation. His article, first published in England, was later serialised in three parts by this newspaper, and then, after I had questioned its logic, subjected to some face-to-face counter-argument by myself in an entire edition of BondìPlus strangely but significantly dedicated to this subject. What does it mean? If a nation does not exist, nor do the Maltese. The nation is the people; not some dynasty, a tract of land or a map.
Second, many people may readily assume that they are Maltese. Because they were born here; and/or because they speak Maltese. But many people who are not Maltese are increasingly born here, several of whom may only barely understand Maltese or not at all. Here I am, by force of circumstance, writing in English for a largely Maltese audience. But nationality is not solely and simply about language, although language is a vital carrier and expression of culture in its widest and deepest sense. Our "language question" was never just about language.
Third, inter-action with "the other" is changing rapidly, profoundly. In colonial times, the "other" was the ruler, hence it was easier to rally around national symbols, such as the Church, or "our ancient history and monuments" and, above all, to demand civil, political and constitutional "rights", which were generally denied, while economic progress was at best intermittent and geared to "foreign" interests...







Oh professor....such nationalism! (insert pleasant smile here...) Clearly IF a nation is defined by a group of people, then there is a "nation" of Malta on Danforth Avenue in Toronto, where nearly as many Maltese live as live in their homeland.
By your definition, I suppose, Canada itself is a state, not a nation. (Actually, it is a "Dominion", if we wish to split hairs.) There is no "national identity", for instance, people forever confuse me for a citizen of the US, or maybe even England. Usually we define ourselves by what we are not...we are NOT American, we are NOT British, for that matter, we are NOT Maltese. Usually we decide that we are an amalgamation of all the above. This might be what your Maltese-Canadian sociologist had in mind.
And we are doing okay.
Occasionally we start naval gazing, trying to define our national identity, and fail, whereas Maltese citizens on the whole have succeeded in defining themselves as a Nation in all positive respects. The "urgent question" has been answered. This solid inner knowledge of what it means to be a Maltese is one of the attractions of Malta, though I do have to admit to the occassional minor mental shock at some aspect of Maltese culture.
But though Maltese culture can exist outside Malta for a generation or two, you need the honey coloured stones of home to set your roots and keep it alive.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home