International Policy: Web of Influence
Foreign Policy is a global portal for economics, politics and ideas. A recent article discusses the impact of blogging on international affairs. From Foreign Policy:
Every day, millions of online diarists, or “bloggers,” share their opinions with a global audience. Drawing upon the content of the international media and the World Wide Web, they weave together an elaborate network with agenda-setting power on issues ranging from human rights in China to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. What began as a hobby is evolving into a new medium that is changing the landscape for journalists and policymakers alike.
It was March 21, 2003—two days after the United States began its “shock and awe” campaign against Iraq—and the story dominating TV networks was the rumor (later proven false) that Saddam Hussein’s infamous cousin, Ali Hassan al-Majid (“Chemical Ali”), had been killed in an airstrike. But, for thousands of other people around the world who switched on their computers rather than their television sets, the lead story was the sudden and worrisome disappearance of Salam Pax.
Otherwise known as the “Baghdad Blogger,” Salam Pax was the pseudonym for a 29-year-old Iraqi architect whose online diary, featuring wry and candid observations about life in wartime, transformed him into a cult figure. It turned out that technical difficulties, not U.S. cruise missiles or Baathist Party thugs, were responsible for the three-day Salam Pax blackout. In the months that followed, his readership grew to millions, as his accounts were quoted in the New York Times, BBC, and Britain’s Guardian newspaper. If the first Gulf War introduced the world to the “CNN effect,” then the second Gulf War was blogging’s coming out party. Salam Pax was the most famous blogger during that conflict (he later signed a book and movie deal), but myriad other online diarists, including U.S. military personnel, emerged to offer real-time analysis and commentary..
Plenty of bloggers discuss international affairs, but a few, in addition to those mentioned in this article, stand out from the crowd. Jeff Jarvis’s “BuzzMachine” is the single best source for information on the global expansion of the blogosphere. University of California, Berkeley, economist Brad DeLong (“Brad DeLong’s Semi-Daily Journal”) is perhaps the most influential economics blogger, while Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrok comment on microeconomic theory and the globalization of culture at “Marginal Revolution.” The group weblog “Oxblog” has won serious media attention for its campaign promoting an assertive U.S. foreign policy supporting human rights and democracy.
Blog coverage varies throughout the world. Although Salam Pax paved the way for Iraqi bloggers, he has stopped blogging himself, and only around 70 Iraqi blogs have picked up where he left off. Among the more prominent: “Iraq: The Model” and “Baghdad Burning,” which respectively support and oppose the U.S. military intervention. Western Europe has a sizeable number of blogs, especially in Britain, with the right-wing “Edge of England’s Sword” and the pro-war leftist “Harry’s Place.” “Slugger O’Toole” covers the Northern Ireland beat, while “A Fistful of Euros” seeks to provide an overview of Western European politics. Elsewhere, “BlogAfrica” syndicates blogs from across that continent, while “Living in China” offers an expatriate perspective on Chinese politics and society. Last is the blog of Japanese tech entrepreneur and venture capitalist Joi Ito (“Joi Ito’s Web”). He reportedly visits 190 blogs regularly and averages five hours a day reading and writing blogs.







I would like to invite you to share your impressions, ideas and links related to the growing impact of blogging on international coverage of world events.
Is that 'homework' ;)? Great post Robert.
I think that the danger lies in confusing "blogging" with "journalism".
A journalist writing for a newspaper is bound by a certain amount of accountability - he must be able to cite his sources if challenged, and may be sued for slander or libel.
A blogger is not accountable in this way, and enjoys the freedom of expression without the responsibility to tell only the confirmed truth when reporting events/facts.
This can be both good and bad - a blogger like Salaam Pax could say things that a journalist wouldn't be allowed by his government to say, even if it was the truth.
But when you have a blogger saying "These are the facts" then caveat emptor because unless you confirm these 'facts' for yourself, you really only have his word for it.
A lie can run around the world before the truth can get its boots on. :-)
An opinion piece is one thing, of course, and everyone should be free to express his opinion, but to refer to a previous post, I think that most people reading in a blog that Malta "occupies an area of 117,000 square kilometers on the coast of northern Africa" would just accept that as fact, without checking it, and move on.
I think that besides being a means of expressing unsanctioned opinions, blogging is great for providing the perspective of "the man on the street" when it comes to world events, because it makes you think about individual impact. For instance, I read blogs on the Asian tsunami, and followed the developments in the Orange Revolution in the Ukraine, and these 'world events' became more real to me instead of just being news items.
But the reader has to remember that a blog, is, after all, a blog, and is very much an expression of the opinion of the blogger, even when something is presented as fact. Unwary readers will wind up with a distorted picture, although you can argue that this picture may be truer to life than the cleaned-up and still-distorted picture given in the mainstream media.
Anyway that's my 2 cents :-)
You can express your opinion in internet. But it has some problems. Internet is an ocean of information. It is hard to find right information especially when anyone can publish anything. But on the other hand you can find more information´s channels. It depends on you, which you will choose.
I heart a lot about presenting ideas on internet, I saw a lots of discutions, but I didnt expect thing like that. Bloging opened my mind specially in case of Iraq and helped me to undestand the real issues happenig in this region. If I had a chance to compare the situation in Iraq, now, after the US intervention and succesfull ellections in the country, I will compare it with "Velvet revoluton" in Czecho-slovakia in year 1989. Surely, there were no american soldiers protecting us, but russian troops leaving our country. In other hand, the feeling represented by Mohamed are really very similar. As we believed in democracy in year 1989, as we celebrated laissez faire, and freedom of speech, people in Iraq have found the same feelings 15 years ago. Maybe, they will be in the end of the day a little bit dissapointed, like we are, because living in democracy isnt the same like living in paradise. As I realise, the rights we get are very important for us and a few of us /the older generation/woud change, if they had a chance back to socialism.
In the news, specially here, in Czech republic, you cant hear about the backround image of American decision to name Syria as a most active terror-supporting regime in Middle East. After a few minutes reading blog from Mohamed, you will understant a lots of happening in Iraq, and you will see the diferencies between Egypt, Iraq and Syria.
"Arabbian war", as seen in media isnt the war of Arabs living in Middle East agains western states. In reality, the most of soldiers arent Muslims, even they call each other so. From Mohameds blog, you can read, that "real" figter is not visiting mosque, even it is written in Koran, isnt praying nor 5-times a day, nor even praying and fighting just for no money at all /in some cases they are executing their own unarmed people from Iraq/.
To speak about Libanon, we will find in blogs new information about the real situation. The Syrian government /following this source/ will leave the territority of Libanon in order to show Libanon people, that without Syrian troops they are totally unprotected against the terrorists of all kind. But in the reality, the Syrian government will send some of their agents to "empasize" this lack of protection. Isnt that just a misusing power of bigger state on smaler one?
Bloging is here to "bridge the gaps", to be "complement" to phones, faxes and news. Because bloging gives us, users of internet, a real change to see global or local issues in "real light" interpreted by people, that really comes throught, it is essential helper to all of us, those want to be "in picture" in case to understant and make realistic opinion about the situation in the world.
Usually I felt entusiasm in the blogging from Baghdad. Keep it, it is nice to hear about you in good terms instead of bombing and executing, that we listen in the news.
In the point of distinction between blogger and journalism I pretty much agree with MaltaGirl (see her post above).
I guess here is the right place to mention that the possibilities on internet are unlimited but what is the most important uncontrollable. In some way internet (meaning internet used mainly for informational purposes) is still in development. People are having more and more ways how to express themselves and as normally thinking human being they are “enchanted” by that and they try what they can. On the other hand not many people are aware of the necessity to cross-check the information and to compare them with other resources. When people realize this necessity and will start to think about information on internet as of information with about 50% chance to be true (depends on the webpage and resourse, of course-but attacks of hackers even to such a pages as of Guardian or other newspapers are known, and for some time there were completely misleading information for a public display) they can finally pronounce themselves as internet users.
Other think about bloggs can be, that it is just up to “the final user of them” – reader, which blogg he will read and send posts to. If there is a blog with other kind of philosophy than of the reader, he will definitely avoid such a blog and will find some with suitable attitude. This way he can avoid “internet row”…simply said he will not have any necessity to confront his opinion with the opinion of others. He will be “stuck” in the community of similarly thinking people.
And don’t even let me start on addiction to blogs. How can be in possibilies of one guy to check about 190 blogs each about 5 hours and to read all new articles plus send comments!!! He wont be doing anything else!!!
Somebody wrote deep in the disputation, that blogging is uncontrollable (was meant in the bad way). I perceive this trait in a very positive way, because there are always some stresses beyond trying to change (or distort) the facts. Of course that blogging is not about facts, especially when you read only limited number of blogs. But on condition of being in touch with many blogs(suppose to focus just on one area) you may access the smooth information. As more dangerous I find the pressures, that can affect newspapers, commonly viewed as serious and objective. Particular journals (at least in Czech Rep)are in relation with certain political parties or power groups and these links are the more effective, the more hidden. Normal people do not realize anythink when reading and it is this hideness that is dangerous. Contrary, to the blogging you do not approach as to the pure fact publishig, you expect some personal opinions (or lets call it manipulation?). By this (i mean the conclusion) i want to react to the MaltaGirl.
Anyway i will slightly slip to the moral at the end. Blogging is based on discussions(suppose access to information), and not only on discussions amid the experts like you can see in papers. It is based on PUBLIC discussions, and these two elements, the PUBLIC and the DISCUSSIONS, is what makes the real democracy
At the beggining I have to say that I have no experience with blogers and blogging in spite of my daily work with the internet. I use mostly information only from, lets call them, reputable and well-known journals (home and international) as well as from TV news. This is for me a guarantee of their genuineness.
I live in Czech republic and I can say we have an independent media. Of course there are some journals and TV channels, which incline to left or to right in political scene or trying to add something extra to their reportages, but there is still very high certainty that the information are right.
According to my opinion bloggers can bring interesting views on situation and complement news from main media, but we haven´t such cerainty that is true or the blogger is only trying to be visible.
Blogging is way how to share your opinion and also how to spread information. Everybody who wants to know the 100% true information must fold up right pieces of puzzle, which are placed in global informational network and that is impossible.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home